Hallo, Genossinnen und Genossen!
Before this week's post, I wanted to
let you know about a new project- I'm trying to add in a brief piece
dedicated to theory every Friday for a month, and see what that does
to readership. This Friday you'll see my reflections on Rosa
Luxemburg's “Leninism or Marxism” and “The Russian
Revolution”.! We'll see if more discussion of ideas rather than
events gets us back on the awesome track we enjoyed from
April-September.
My apologies for not putting this up in
a more timely manner, but it turned out to be a good thing I didn't-
it meant I got to read CNN's poll from yesterday, which provides some
much needed contextual good news!
Well, first, I'm transcribing my notes-
Webb: bomb Iran, not Syria or Libya,
and China is mean and scary we should get ready to bomb them too. He
also went out of his way to insult the BLM movement by saying “All
Lives Matter”- as if whites like him and me face any of the same
dangers our Black comrades do. He then went on to explain why we
should let China and India make the first move on stopping
world-threatening pollution. Seriously, if they allow him in the
next debate it should only be to the podium rigged with a trap door
below it. (Glad to hear he's dropping out- heheheh)
Clinton: Criticizing me for supporting
our attack on Iraq is criticizing the president who picked me as
Secretary of State! This seemed to be a refrain throughout the
night- she's running as the heir apparent to Obama, which is reason
enough to want Biden in the race
When it came to foreign policy, pretty
much all O'Malley and Chafee could say was that they agree with
Bernie- wars need to be a product of multilateral agreement, not
adventurism.
There was a concerted effort to paint
Sanders as a gun-lover, and he responded pretty gracefully I thought,
calling for a partnership on issues of reform of gun laws, but that
wasn't enough to stop a significant media backlash, unfortunately.
Honestly, as long as we keep letting rural voters have 70 times the
say of urban voters as the constitution requires, the “any gun,
anywhere for any reason” dogma seems pretty firmly entrenched.
Some BBC journalist wrote that the gun control debate ended after
Sandy Hook: when we as a country decided that letting men play with
guns was more important than protecting children's lives, the debate
was over. I'm optimistic that if the Dems get one more term they can
give the Supreme Court a shove though- after Heller there's not much
cities or states can do to keep their people safe from the gun
violence enthusiasts.
Sanders also presented himself
successfully as the dove, and even managed to shake off mention of
his application as a conscientious objector to the US occupation of
southern Vietnam without betraying any principles- that really
signals a passing of the torch to me- that candidates can be antiwar
in their youth without being shamed.
Our Genosse also got in terrific lines
on the naivete of those like Clinton who think they can motivate Wall
Street Speculators to be kinder without changing the incentive
structure. I generally think he did well at drawing some contrast
without leaving himself open to charges of attacking Clinton, though
I thought he should have pushed harder. Spoiler alert- according to
CNN's polling, I was very wrong and Genosse Bernie's course of action
was exactly right.
Finally, what I perceived as his best
moment came when asked to name the greatest national security threat.
Genosse Sanders was the only candidate to lead his answer with
“Climate Change”. O'Malley listed it third I think. Sanders'
focus on environmental safety isthe best reason I can think of to support him!
CNN polling reports that Sanders
received a 5% boost in support since the debate, and that over 30% of
Democrats watched at least part of it. Also critical is that while
Clinton still holds leads on all issues they polled for among the
general public and among Democrats, among those who watched the
debate Bernie draws even with her on Climate Change and holds a
commanding 15 point lead on income inequality. This is vital- so it
looks like 1 in 5 of debate viewers switched to Bernie, (bringing us
within 15 points of Clinton nationally for the first time), and that
Sanders' commitment to breaking up too-big-to-fail banks and
reinstating Glass-Steagal is better received than Clinton's nuanced
attempts to prop up the vultures while posturing as their enemy. In
a sentence: when people actually hear Bernie and Clinton side by
side, Bernie starts to win!
Solidarität, Genossinnen und Genossen
Elise
Did you mean to abandon that last sentence in the 2nd to last paragraph? Great summary write up of the debate. Wish I could have seen it.
ReplyDeleteI don't know how to tell you this or where to go from here but gun control is every bit as entrenched in our national psyche as abortion rights are. These are two areas where will always have to agree to disagree because the polar forces are fatally entrenched. Those of us who are "a little in favor of all side?tolerance" are laughable to both sides and therefore totally ineffective in the debates. I get it: the world is extreme and I am not. I'm just letting you know that we can debate those points to the end of time but as long as there is a USA, we will have strong polarizjng forces preventing a one-sided solution to pro choice and gun control. Not saying I like it.
Did you see the New York Times' piece documenting the flow of legally purchased guns into states that try to regulate them? for example over 70% of guns used in Chicago crime come from Indiana gun shows alone. It's easier to transport guns than pregnant women, so as long as there's any area opposed to gun control, any kind of regulation is impossible. Whereas all we need to lose abortion rights forever is for Anthony Kennedy to continue his recent line of "women make decisions impulsively" reasoning. I agree with you that the prochoice movement won't be repressed by anything short of a Handmaid's Tale level restructuring of society (and we won't give up even then!) but I think it would be much easier for the government/church to completely control women's sexuality (at least legally) than to pass any meaningful gun regulation.
ReplyDelete"A poorly regulated cult of fanatics being diamatrically opposed to the security of a free state, the ability of said fanatics to fetishize and play with arms cannot be infringed"
Totally agree! Who's the quote by? You should cite. True dat, about controlling the guns. It's never made sense to me why citizens should own fully or semi automatic weapons.
DeleteTotally agree! Who's the quote by? You should cite. True dat, about controlling the guns. It's never made sense to me why citizens should own fully or semi automatic weapons.
DeleteThat one was just me, actually:) Sorry it's been so quiet- a lot of my political energy goes to the campaign now.
Delete